Ethics is a wide topic that touches every facet of our
individual lives and our society.
I want to talk about a very small slice. The fact that ethics has, in certain cases, been boiled down
to one concern – environmental ethics or how we interact with the natural world. In particular, reducing one’s carbon
footprint.
Let me explain.
The BBC recently appointed Justin Rowlett as “Ethical Man”, his task was
for him, along with his family, to live ethically for one year. Something we should all aspire to,
right? However, his ethical duties
were not to help old ladies across the road, to treat others with respect, but
to live in such a way so that he and his family would minimize their carbon
footprint and consequently their impact on the environment. (1)
There is a clothing line in New York City called the “The
Ethical Man” that manufactures and sells clothing made with a minimal impact on
the environment. (2)
I’m not claiming that thinking about how we use natural
resources is not part of what we call ethics. I’m saying that environmental ethics are a part and not the
whole of living the ethical life.
I simply have a concern that by portraying one aspect of our
existence as living the ethical life, we may stunt truly ethical
behavior. We can tell people it is
better to ride a bike to work than drive, but if they ride in a reckless manner
so that they run an old lady over on their way, can we say they are acting
ethically in a holistic sense?
Moreover, if we tell people that they can be ethical solely
by bike riding and recycling that may provide some with an easy way out. Throughout human history, we have tried
to boil down the ethical life to rules that we can follow. Jesus confronted Jewish religious
leaders who claimed living the “ethical life” could be accomplished by
following an increasingly elaborate system of religious rules but did not truly
behave ethically.
Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You give a tenth of your spices—mint, dill and cumin. But you have neglected the more important matters of the law—justice, mercy and faithfulness. You should have practiced the latter, without neglecting the former. (3)
And
Jesus replied, “And you experts in the law, woe to you, because you load people down with burdens they can hardly carry, and you yourselves will not lift one finger to help them. (4)
He instead stated that only by changing one’s character can one
truly act ethically. He contended
that it was not just our actions that determine whether or not we act
ethically but our underlying thoughts and attitudes.
You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘You shall not murder, and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment.’ But I tell you that anyone who is angry with a brother or sister will be subject to judgment. (5)
How to act ethically, to live the “good life”, is a problem
that many have wrestled with throughout history, and one that all thinking
people should carefully examine.
We should not let ourselves or others off the hook by pretending that following
rules in a certain area of life, we are truly and completely ethical.
For more on this topic please see this post – Good.
(1) See http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/ethical_man/default.stm.
(2) See http://www.theethicalman.com/.
(3) Matthew
23:3 (New International Version).
(4) Luke 11:46 (New
International Version).
(5) Matthew 5:21-22
(New International Version).
No comments:
Post a Comment