tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4055129112728408987.post3452518043326252073..comments2023-05-28T00:49:59.156-07:00Comments on Songs of a Semi-Free Man: Divine InventionSongs of a Semi-Free Manhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05666794329484768175noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4055129112728408987.post-81423611978198612002011-01-04T05:43:50.092-08:002011-01-04T05:43:50.092-08:00This argument is refreshingly transparent. It is s...This argument is refreshingly transparent. It is similar to the Kantian response to Hume's empiricism. Namely, Kant hated the absurd solipsism that is the end point of strictly empiricist though. My problem with Kant's ontological proof of the existence of God is only that it was agenda driven. He didn't like where pure empircist logic took him, so he invented things like A priori knowledge to help steer him away. Your argument has much more intellectual integrity in that you seem to only go so far as to point out the need for the question. Stephen, I didn't know you were interested in or had any knowledge in these areas. We could have engaged in significantly more fruitful discussion instead of making jokes about people's head size.(Although that's still fun.) I look forward to reading all your entries on this blog.mattymohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11989534726556207972noreply@blogger.com